Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial

Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2021³â 21±Ç 4È£ p.345 ~ 355
Sahithi Varada, Saikiran Kanamarlapudi Venkata, Nunna Mahesh, Elicherla Sainath Reddy, Challa Ramasubba Reddy, Nuvvula Sivakumar,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Sahithi Varada ) - Narayana Dental College and Hospital Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Saikiran Kanamarlapudi Venkata ) - SVS Institute of Dental Sciences Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Nunna Mahesh ) - Narayana Dental College and Hospital Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Elicherla Sainath Reddy ) - Narayana Dental College and Hospital Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Challa Ramasubba Reddy ) - Narayana Dental College and Hospital Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Nuvvula Sivakumar ) - Narayana Dental College and Hospital Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry

Abstract


Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4?11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy¢ç device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Significant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group.

Conclusion: External vibration using a Buzzy¢ç device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy.

Å°¿öµå

Anesthesia; Child; Dental Anxiety; Pain; Pulpectomy; Vibration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI